Derek Moore
2014-10-09 17:53:33 UTC
Following the INSTALL doc, I was building git with:
make prefix=/usr/local all doc info
Even after installing docbook2X, I couldn't get past the first DB2TEXI
build step until I discovered that 'docbook2x-texi' is named
'db2x_docbook2texi' in Fedora 21 using the latest upstream docbook2X
0.8.8.
To the "everything" build to complete, I had to make this change:
$ git diff
diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile
index cea0e7a..0e6c70a 100644
--- a/Documentation/Makefile
+++ b/Documentation/Makefile
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ HTML_REPO = ../../git-htmldocs
MAKEINFO = makeinfo
INSTALL_INFO = install-info
-DOCBOOK2X_TEXI = docbook2x-texi
+DOCBOOK2X_TEXI = db2x_docbook2texi
DBLATEX = dblatex
ASCIIDOC_DBLATEX_DIR = /etc/asciidoc/dblatex
ifndef PERL_PATH
I searched the mailing list, but don't see 'db2x_docbook2texi'
mentioned since 2010, so I feel somewhat safe brining it up again.
Not sure if the Makefile should somehow conditionally use one or the
other of these commands. ... Or maybe I should have gone the 'make
configure' route?
Thanks,
Derek
make prefix=/usr/local all doc info
Even after installing docbook2X, I couldn't get past the first DB2TEXI
build step until I discovered that 'docbook2x-texi' is named
'db2x_docbook2texi' in Fedora 21 using the latest upstream docbook2X
0.8.8.
To the "everything" build to complete, I had to make this change:
$ git diff
diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile
index cea0e7a..0e6c70a 100644
--- a/Documentation/Makefile
+++ b/Documentation/Makefile
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ HTML_REPO = ../../git-htmldocs
MAKEINFO = makeinfo
INSTALL_INFO = install-info
-DOCBOOK2X_TEXI = docbook2x-texi
+DOCBOOK2X_TEXI = db2x_docbook2texi
DBLATEX = dblatex
ASCIIDOC_DBLATEX_DIR = /etc/asciidoc/dblatex
ifndef PERL_PATH
I searched the mailing list, but don't see 'db2x_docbook2texi'
mentioned since 2010, so I feel somewhat safe brining it up again.
Not sure if the Makefile should somehow conditionally use one or the
other of these commands. ... Or maybe I should have gone the 'make
configure' route?
Thanks,
Derek